|
Financing
for the Future of the U.S. Textile Industry - A Tough Sell
by Dale Fite
The U.S. textile
industry has endured several tremendous challenges over the past
two decades. During the 80's and 90's, investment in technology
cut production costs to unprecedented levels as the industry prepared
itself for global competition. And most recently, the industry has
painfully endured massive job losses due to unfavorable currency
exchange rates and the unrelenting low cost competition that has
flooded domestic retail markets. U.S. textile companies that have
survived this incredible attrition must now determine how to compete
in the future and how to finance their business strategy.
|
ABOUT
THE AUTHOR
Dale
Fite
|
|

A
native of Gastonia, Dale Fite received a B.S. in Textile Management
from the College of Textiles at NCSU in 1992 and an M.S. from
the Institute of Textile Technology in 1994. Most recently
he received an MBA from the Fuqua School of Business at Duke
University.
He began his career as a Department Manager with Parkdale
Mills and later moved to Harriet
and Henderson Yarns, Inc. At H&H he served as a Process
Improvement Engineer, Vice President of Raw Material Purchasing
and general procurement, and currently as Chief Financial
Officer for the corporation.
|
Although securing
financing for the future may seem like a relatively simple proposition,
U.S. textile firms are being virtually ignored by most traditional
financial markets for a number of reasons. First, the intense foreign
competition that has challenged U.S. firms over the past few years
has eroded industry margins and cash flow and made it difficult
for many firms to service their existing debt loads. As a result,
there have been numerous Chapter 11 and Chapter 7 bankruptcy filings
in the U.S textile industry over the past few years. Second, equity
markets have been equally unkind to U.S. textile firms, with many
firms seeing common share prices at historical lows, rendering it
virtually impossible for these companies to secure cash through
the issuance of additional equity. And most importantly, financial
institutions recognize that the U.S. textile business is undergoing
some potentially devastating changes.
It is widely
known in the financial community that in 2005, the U.S textile industry
will be subjected to more intense global competition as textile
and apparel import quotas are eliminated as specified under GATT.
Furthermore, most financial analysts believe that China's acceptance
into the WTO will only exacerbate the competitive pressures on U.S.
firms. Moreover, the U.S. firms that survive this onslaught will
most likely be forced to service a larger customer base composed
of mainly Mexican and Caribbean customers via NAFTA or CBI, rather
than their traditional customer base dominated by U.S. customers.
Unfortunately, U.S. banks have historically believed that foreign
textile customers produce increased credit and collections risk
and as a result, U.S. firms are typically not allowed to borrow
against these outstanding foreign receivables. In short, we have
an industry that will be tested by more intense competition and
likely suffer a strain on working capital due to a change in customer
demographics.
Against this
backdrop, U.S. textile companies must carefully and precisely map
out their strategy for the future. First, each and every U.S. textile
firm must determine how it will address 2005, China, and the chaos
that may follow, so that it can demonstrate to the financial community
its plan for profitability. This is very important because banks
are unlikely to provide new term financing to textile companies
without a well-designed plan for addressing these issues and a strategy
that demonstrates a sustainable core business. Second, U.S. firms
should continue to seek foreign joint-venture partnerships using
existing textile equipment as an equity investment in plants that
can utilize inexpensive labor and survive post-2005. Most of the
equipment that U.S. firms purchased in the 90's still has tremendous
value when coupled with the correct labor complement. Finally, U.S.
companies must continue to lobby Congress for financial relief,
restrictive tariffs, and a level playing field with the rest of
the world. These steps may sound difficult and even painful in some
cases, but they may represent the best financial options left for
this struggling industry.
|